The Human Intelligence Method helps educators redesign learning so students do not outsource judgment, curiosity, and responsibility to AI.
The conversation about AI in education has shrunk into two flat positions. Ban it. Or embrace it. Both feel responsible. Neither is.
The argument · in three moves
01 · THE PROBLEM
AI broke
the proxy.
For decades, the artifact stood in for the act of thinking. AI severed that contract. The page no longer tells us what happened in the mind.
Read Part I →02 · THE METHOD
Make thinking
visible.
Five principles for educators who want to evaluate what the mind did, not what the page contains. With a 20-minute version that works in any classroom.
Read the Five Principles →03 · THE LAB
A founding circle of educators.
A four-week working circle for thirty educators. Real assignments, real students, real cases. We build the method by using it.
Apply for the Lab →Inside the manifesto
The Five Principles of the Method
From "the artifact is not the act" to "judgment cannot be outsourced." A coherent framework educators can apply this term, not next year.
A redesigned Marie Curie assignment, in full
One complete worked example. Five stages — Before AI, With AI, After AI, Final Work, Oral Defense. Adaptable to any subject.
The 20-minute version, for any teacher
A practice that fits inside a single class period. Twice a week, for a few weeks, and you begin to see a different kind of thinking in the room.
The seven capacities that must remain human
What we are actually defending in a thirteen-year-old when we say their thinking should remain their own.
The manifesto
Get the free manifesto and occasional letters from Sofiko on teaching in the age of AI.
Thirty-eight pages. One position. A practical method for educators in the age of AI.